Justice Department Proposes Pausing Court Procedures During Emergency

March 25, 2020 by Tom Ramstack
Justice Department Proposes Pausing Court Procedures During Emergency
The Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON -The Justice Department is asking Congress to authorize courts to detain criminal suspects indefinitely without trials until the coronavirus subsides.

The request would give chief federal judges the power to alter procedures for arrests, investigations and how the cases are processed through the courts.

The Justice Department submitted its written request to lawmakers shortly after President Trump declared coronavirus to be a national emergency this month. This week, the U.S. surgeon general warned the epidemic is about to become “really bad” in the United States.

One segment of the documents seeks authority for judges to pause the statute of limitations for criminal and civil cases “and for one year following the end of the national emergency.”

Civil liberties advocates caution that slower court procedures risk violating the Sixth Amendment, which is supposed to guarantee defendants a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury.

They also say the authorization sought by the Justice Department could extend far beyond the coronavirus pandemic to other situations the federal government describes as emergencies.

President Trump already is enduring criticism for using coronavirus as a justification to increase border restrictions and to limit asylum claims. He also is asking Congress for more tax cuts to boost economic development as employment and stock markets falter.

The Justice Department submission to Congress would grant chief judges in any district the power to pause proceedings “whenever the district court is fully or partially closed by virtue of any natural disaster, civil disobedience or other emergency situation.” The request would begin with the attorney general.

Another controversial part of the documents would expand use of video-conference hearings, sometimes without the defendants’ consent.

Democrats in Congress are signaling that the proposal faces tough opposition among lawmakers.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., called the idea “abhorrent” during an interview this week on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“There’s a long history in this country and in other countries of using emergencies as times to really start to encroach upon people’s civil rights,” she said. “And, in fact, this is the time when we need them the absolute most.”

The Justice Department denied risks that civil rights would be impaired for political reasons.

Justice Department spokesman Kerri Kupec said in tweets this week that the proposal would empower judges and ensure “consistency” in their response to an emergency.

“The goal of these provisions (is) to ensure that the justice system continues to operate equitably and effectively, and to harmonize what is already being done on an ad hoc basis by courts around the country,” Kupec wrote. “Bottom line: The proposed legislative text confers powers upon judges. It does not confer new powers upon the executive branch.”

A+
a-
  • Coronavirus
  • emergencies
  • Justice Department
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Courts

    November 30, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    New York Appellate Court Reinstates Trump Gag Orders

    NEW YORK — A New York appeals court panel on Thursday reinstated a pair of gag orders issued in Donald... Read More

    NEW YORK — A New York appeals court panel on Thursday reinstated a pair of gag orders issued in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial that barred the former president from speaking publicly about the judge’s court staff. The two-page decision by the New York State Supreme... Read More

    Ohio Voters Just Passed Abortion Protections. When and How They Take Effect Is Before Courts

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio’s new constitutional protections for abortion access and other reproductive rights take effect Dec. 7, a... Read More

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio’s new constitutional protections for abortion access and other reproductive rights take effect Dec. 7, a month after voters resoundingly passed them. How and when their impacts are felt remains unclear. Existing abortion-related lawsuits are moving again through the courts now that voters... Read More

    November 20, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Appeals Court Considers Lifting Gag Order Against Trump

    WASHINGTON — Federal appeals judges in Washington, D.C., seemed skeptical Monday about arguments by attorneys for Donald Trump that a... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Federal appeals judges in Washington, D.C., seemed skeptical Monday about arguments by attorneys for Donald Trump that a gag order should be withdrawn to allow him to criticize court personnel in his election interference case. Trump has used phrases like “corrupt,” “deranged” and “red... Read More

    November 16, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    New York Appellate Court Judge Lifts Trump Gag Order

    NEW YORK — A New York appellate court judge on Thursday temporarily lifted the gag order placed on former President... Read More

    NEW YORK — A New York appellate court judge on Thursday temporarily lifted the gag order placed on former President Donald Trump and his attorneys in his civil fraud trial following an emergency hearing. Associate Justice David Friedman of the First Judicial Department ruled from the... Read More

    November 10, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Stefanik Files Ethics Complaint Against Trump Fraud Trial Judge

    EAST GREENBUSH, N.Y. — Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., filed an ethics complaint on Friday calling for the removal of the... Read More

    EAST GREENBUSH, N.Y. — Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., filed an ethics complaint on Friday calling for the removal of the judge presiding over the $250 million business fraud trial of former President Donald Trump. Stefanik, who serves as House Republican Conference chair, is one of the... Read More

    Texas Judge Rules Against GOP Lawsuit Seeking to Toss 2022 Election Result in Houston Area

    HOUSTON (AP) — A Texas judge has denied a Republican effort to overturn election results in the nation’s third-most populous county, a... Read More

    HOUSTON (AP) — A Texas judge has denied a Republican effort to overturn election results in the nation’s third-most populous county, a Democratic stronghold that’s been beset by GOP efforts to dictate how ballots are cast. A losing GOP candidate in a November judicial race had filed a... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top