Class Actions Against China Grow Despite Foreign Policy Obstacles

April 23, 2020 by Tom Ramstack
Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a lawsuit against the Chinese government, the Community Party of China and others, alleging that the hiding of information and other actions at the outset of the coronavirus outbreak led to loss of life and significant economic damage in Missouri. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

WASHINGTON – Law firms and their clients who are joining the growing list of plaintiffs against the Chinese government over the coronavirus outbreak are running up against a foreign policy that could rule out any successful lawsuits.

About a half-dozen class action lawsuits have been filed in federal courts against China.

However, they appear to be overlooking legal recourse through international tribunals, according to a new public policy foundation’s report.

The lawsuits argue that China’s negligent or reckless failure to adequately warn other countries about dangers of the epidemic when it was first noticed last December in the city of Wuhan has endangered millions of people worldwide.

In the United States, the death toll from coronavirus is near 50,000.

Lawsuits against foreign countries must overcome tough standards of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, which bans private legal action unless it falls under rare exceptions, according to legal experts.

One of the experts is former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano, who also acts as a legal policy analyst for Fox News.

“At the present time, they don’t have a case because of the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act [of 1976], which basically says American courts do not have jurisdiction over the behavior of foreign governments and that, of course, would bar nearly any lawsuit against the government of China,” Napolitano said.

Generally, private lawsuits are allowed if a plaintiff’s claim is based on commercial activity performed in the United States by the foreign government. Typical examples are state-sponsored foreign airlines and financial institutions.

Other exceptions could include industrial espionage and thefts of private property during “genocidal takings” by foreign militaries or agents.

A lawsuit filed by the state of Missouri this week tries to cite the commercial activity exception but gives scant evidence the epidemic resulted from China’s business relations in the United States.

The Missouri lawsuit seeks unspecified compensation “for the enormous loss of life, human suffering and economic turmoil experienced by all Missourians from the COVID-19 pandemic that has disrupted the entire world.”

It also accuses China of misleading other countries about how easily the virus can spread, silencing medical personnel who tried to warn others and hoarding medical supplies.

People’s Republic of China officials deny wrongdoing.

“This so-called lawsuit is very absurd and has no factual and legal basis at all,” China Foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at a daily briefing this week. 

Since the outbreak began, China has proceeded in an “open, transparent, and responsible manner” and the U.S. government should “dismiss such vexatious litigation,” he said.

The Trump administration has given no indication it supports the Missouri lawsuit or the private class actions.

If a U.S. class action lawsuit succeeds, it could be worth $1.2 trillion in damages, according to the British conservative public policy foundation the Henry Jackson Society.

A report from the foundation accuses China of intentionally withholding information from the World Health Organization in a way that represents a violation of the International Health Regulations.

The report also said plaintiffs could bypass domestic laws and courts by petitioning international tribunals. They include the World Health Organization, the International Court of Justice, Permanent Court of Arbitration and courts in Hong Kong.


Washington Judge Hits Postmaster with Election Mail Injunction
Postal Service
Washington Judge Hits Postmaster with Election Mail Injunction

A federal judge in the nation’s capital is the latest to order the Trump administration not to implement policy changes that could delay mail delivery for voters in the November elections. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington, D.C., issued a preliminary injunction in a case... Read More

Census Bureau Reverses Course on Layoffs After Court Order
Census Bureau Reverses Course on Layoffs After Court Order
September 8, 2020
by Dan McCue

The Census Bureau told a federal judge on Tuesday that it will delay laying off some census takers and will restore quality-control measures it had already begun winding down as the end of the once-a-decade population count nears its end. The notice, in a court filing,... Read More

Tech Giants Try to Dismiss Lawsuit Accusing Them of Child Labor Violation
Tech Giants Try to Dismiss Lawsuit Accusing Them of Child Labor Violation
August 27, 2020
by Tom Ramstack

WASHINGTON -- Some of America’s technology giants are trying to get a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit accusing them of promoting the use of children to mine cobalt for their lithium-ion batteries. Apple, Google, Microsoft, Dell and Tesla said in their motion to dismiss this... Read More

Trump Campaign Lawsuit Over Ballot Drop Boxes is Placed on Hold
Trump Campaign Lawsuit Over Ballot Drop Boxes is Placed on Hold

A lawsuit by President Donald Trump’s campaign seeking to block Pennsylvania counties from using drop boxes to collect mail-in ballots was put on hold Sunday by a federal judge who said state courts should have a chance to decide the matter first. U.S. District Judge J.... Read More

Voter Lawsuit Aims to Block Mask Mandate at Minnesota Polling Places
Voter Lawsuit Aims to Block Mask Mandate at Minnesota Polling Places

MINNEAPOLIS — A group of voters backed by Republican legislators sued Gov. Tim Walz and other state and local officials Tuesday in federal court, aiming to block a face mask requirement at polling places. Members of the Minnesota Voters Alliance and GOP lawmakers contend Walz’s mask... Read More

2020 Election Will Be Most Litigated in US History
Political News
2020 Election Will Be Most Litigated in US History

The 2020 election between President Donald Trump and Joe Biden is shaping up to be the most litigated in U.S. history, as changes to balloting prompted by the coronavirus pandemic spur lawsuits that could leave the outcome in suspense for days or even weeks. A recent... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top