FEC Asked to Set Value for Campaign Research in Senate Race
WASHINGTON — The campaign committee for Senate Democrats has asked the Federal Election Commission to appraise the value of a “research book” it wants to provide to two Democratic candidates to aid in their bids to unseat an incumbent Republican senator.
In its letter sent last month to Lisa Stevenson, acting attorney general counsel of the commission, attorneys for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee explain that the group paid $30,000 to a consultant to write the research book “regarding a sitting Republican United States Senator.”
The letter neither identifies the Senator nor the state he represents.
“The DSCC plans to use the information contained within the book to inform its own political strategy in the sitting Republican Senator’s state for the 2022 U.S. Senate election,” the letter states, adding “after receiving the book, DSCC plans to review the content and then provide the research book in full to two candidates for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in State A this year.”
“Each candidate will receive the book on the same day and will use the book in whole or in part for their own political purposes, at their discretion and without restriction,” the letter says.
The campaign committee plans to offer each campaign the choice of paying it the value of the research book, treating the value of the book as an in-kind contribution from the committee to the campaign – subject to the contribution limit – or treating the value of the book as a coordinated party expenditure, subject to the state-specific limit for that Senate campaign.
“With respect to the third option, the Democratic National Committee has assigned to DSCC its full coordinated party spending authority for the 2022 U.S. Senate election in State A,” the letter says. “This assignment was made in writing prior to the date of this request and expressly notes that the assignment includes the full amount of the coordinated party spending authority.”
The DSCC is asking the Federal Election Commission to sign off on the plan while endorsing the committee’s assertion that the value of the book to each of the two Senate campaigns is $10,000.
A ruling is necessary, it says, to ensure the DSCC is not unfairly profiting from the shared research, and that public reporting of the research book in campaign filings accurately reflects the amount of money actually spent.
The request for an advisory committee offers a few insights into how money will be allocated during the 2022 midterms.
For instance, it notes that the DSCC may lawfully contribute up to $52,100 to a candidate for U.S. Senate in 2022.
In addition, the Federal Election Campaign Act provides that the national committee of a political party is afforded a separate limit for coordinated party expenditures in each U.S. Senate race.
This limit is calculated as the greater of $20,000 or two cents times the voting age population of the state.
Although DSCC is not afforded a coordinated party spending limit in a U.S. Senate race by law, the Democratic National Committee can permissibly assign some or all of its authority in a given state to DSCC.
Such a scenario plays out in this particular race, as noted above. And in such a case, the assignment must be “made in writing, must state the amount of the authority assigned, and must be received by the assignee committee before any coordinated party expenditure is made pursuant to the assignment.”
As for the rationale of according a $10,000 value to the research for each campaign, the DSCC cites the Act and subsequent commission decisions which held that when an expenditure is made on behalf of more than one clearly identified candidate, the value of the expenditure to any one candidate is “attributed to each such candidate according to the benefit reasonably expected to be derived.”
“Accordingly, the value of a research book purchased by DSCC for its own use and also provided to two candidates for U.S. Senate is calculated based on the benefit derived by each of the recipients,” the letter says.
The campaign committee also points to costs related to polling as an example similar to what it is requesting.
“In the context of polling, the commission’s regulations expressly provide that the benefit received from a poll by a single recipient is properly calculated by dividing the cost of the poll by the total number of recipients,” its letter says. “Thus, the value to a campaign of a poll purchased by DSCC and shared with multiple campaigns is calculated by dividing the overall cost of the poll equally among candidates (including state and local candidates) or political committees receiving the results.”
“This formula in the regulation is logical. If the poll was valued by multiplying the cost by the number of recipients, then the poll’s value would be wildly inflated,” the letter says.
“As with polling cost allocation, in other contexts, the commission has held that the calculation of the ‘benefit reasonably expected to be derived’ from a resource by a federal candidate equals only a proportion of the total expense, even when multiple committees may have access to, and use for, the entire resource,” the campaign committee concludes.
“Here, as in all of the examples above, the Commission should permit DSCC to divide the cost of the shared research book between the recipients,” the letter says. “Whether the cost of the research book is considered a coordinated party expenditure, in-kind contribution, or the recipient candidate committee intends to pay DSCC for the research book, the value of the book is most accurately calculated by dividing the costs among the recipient committees.”
Dan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue
In The News
WASHINGTON — Political Consultant Jesse Benton was sentenced Friday to 18 months in prison for his role in funneling illegal... Read More
WASHINGTON — Political Consultant Jesse Benton was sentenced Friday to 18 months in prison for his role in funneling illegal foreign campaign contributions from a Russian national to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. According to court documents, Benton, a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, native who now lives in... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission has updated its contribution limits, indexed for inflation, for the upcoming federal elections in... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission has updated its contribution limits, indexed for inflation, for the upcoming federal elections in 2023 and 2024. The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act, included a number of provisions that indexed some contribution limits... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission last week flagged a number of issues with reported contributions made to embattled Rep.... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission last week flagged a number of issues with reported contributions made to embattled Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., who has come under scrutiny for sweeping lies he’s told about his personal life and career. In a letter dated Jan 4., a... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission is seeking public comment on its policies and procedures for auditing political committees that... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission is seeking public comment on its policies and procedures for auditing political committees that do not receive public funds. Typically, when a non–publicly funded political committee’s disclosure reports indicate it has not met the threshold requirements for substantial compliance with... Read More
WASHINGTON — A firm hoping to design and market NFTs to political committees under the same terms and conditions it... Read More
WASHINGTON — A firm hoping to design and market NFTs to political committees under the same terms and conditions it applies to nonpolitical clients won’t run afoul of prohibitions on corporate contributions, the Federal Election Commission has determined. DataVault, a for-profit corporation organized under Delaware law,... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission is seeking public comment of proposed changes to regulations it is considering regarding candidate... Read More
WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission is seeking public comment of proposed changes to regulations it is considering regarding candidate compensation from campaign funds. Currently, the Federal Election Campaign Act prohibits principal campaign committees from converting campaign funds to personal use. That means they cannot cover... Read More