California Supreme Court Lets New Death Penalty Cases Proceed, Despite Moratorium

September 13, 2019by Nico Savidge
Current California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during election night event on November 6, 2018, in Los Angeles. (Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images/TNS) **FOR USE WITH THIS STORY ONLY**

SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court on Thursday rejected attempts from two men to block prosecutors from seeking the death penalty against them, indicating the court will not stop new death sentences from being imposed, even as Gov. Gavin Newsom has halted executions in the state.

District attorneys have continued to pursue capital cases since Newsom this spring imposed a moratorium on the death penalty while he is in office and dismantled the state’s execution chamber.

Attorneys in two separate cases from Los Angeles County petitioned the state Supreme Court this summer to block prosecutors from seeking death sentences against their clients in part because a future governor could reverse Newsom’s action.

The court rejected both petitions Thursday, allowing the cases against defendants Jade Douglas Harris and Cleamon Johnson to proceed in Los Angeles County, and potentially clearing the way for those men or others to be added to California’s death row, even as executions are on hold.

The justices did not make any further statement explaining their decision, as is typical when the court denies petitions for review, and the action does not officially create a precedent.

But Cliff Gardner, a Berkeley attorney representing several defendants in death penalty appeals, said defendants in other capital cases can probably expect the same response from the high court.

“Unless there is a dramatically different record that comes to the Supreme Court, this ruling indicates they are not going to stop death penalty trials from going forward,” Gardner said.

He said the action also underscores how fleeting Newsom’s reprieve from executions could be if another governor decides to reverse his action.

“It’s not stopping DAs from pursuing capital cases and trying to put guys on (death) row,” Gardner said. “Gov. Newsom’s action speaks for Gov. Newsom and his administration.”

California last executed a convicted inmate in 2006.

Harris has been charged with shooting three people to death at a business in Downey in 2012, while Johnson is accused in a series of gang murders from the early 1990s.

In each petition to the Supreme Court, attorneys argued that it would be impossible for jurors to consider the weight of imposing a death sentence because Newsom’s moratorium has led them to believe it won’t ever be carried out.

Jurors may wrongly conclude the death penalty has been abolished in California, attorneys for Harris wrote, meaning “the courts can no longer safely rely on the premise that jurors recognize a death sentence as an ‘awesome responsibility’ rather than a symbolic verdict.”

Prosecutors from the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office countered that jurors will be properly instructed that an execution could still be carried out if the jury orders it.

“Nothing about the governor’s order alters the jury’s role in the system,” attorneys from the District Attorney’s Office wrote in response to Johnson’s petition.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office declined to comment Thursday on the court’s decision. Lawyers for Johnson and Harris did not respond to requests for comment.

———

©2019 The Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.)

Visit The Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.) at www.mercurynews.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Criminal Justice

He Started Murdering Women in South Florida — Then Became the Worst Serial Killer in US History Crime
He Started Murdering Women in South Florida — Then Became the Worst Serial Killer in US History

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Samuel Little, a 79-year-old man with a penchant for storytelling and drawing chalk pastel portraits in his California prison cell, was recently labeled by the FBI as the United States’ most prolific serial killer. Over the past two years, Little has confessed... Read More

Feds Arrest Fourth Defendant in Campaign Finance Case Involving Giuliani Associates Law
Feds Arrest Fourth Defendant in Campaign Finance Case Involving Giuliani Associates

MIAMI — A self-described former pro golfer from South Florida who was indicted last week on campaign finance charges was arrested by federal authorities on Wednesday. David Correia, who worked with Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas, is now in federal custody and will be arraigned Thursday... Read More

Justices to Consider Life-Without-Parole Sentences in D.C. Sniper Case Supreme Court
Justices to Consider Life-Without-Parole Sentences in D.C. Sniper Case
October 15, 2019
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - Do a pair of decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court require the resentencing of Lee Boyd Malvo, the surviving assailant in the D.C. sniper case? That's the question the justices will consider when it convenes Wednesday to hear oral arguments in the case Mathena... Read More

Why Are Judges Sentencing People on Probation for Debts They Won’t Ever Be Able to Pay? Criminal Justice
Why Are Judges Sentencing People on Probation for Debts They Won’t Ever Be Able to Pay?

PHILADELPHIA — A decade after he was first sentenced in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, Maurice Hudson still could not come up with $1,941 in outstanding court costs — and, at a February hearing, it was clear Judge Genece Brinkley was out of patience. “Each time, he... Read More

California Supreme Court Lets New Death Penalty Cases Proceed, Despite Moratorium Criminal Justice
California Supreme Court Lets New Death Penalty Cases Proceed, Despite Moratorium

SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court on Thursday rejected attempts from two men to block prosecutors from seeking the death penalty against them, indicating the court will not stop new death sentences from being imposed, even as Gov. Gavin Newsom has halted executions in the... Read More

Appeals Court Says Ohio Execution Protocol Doesn’t Cause Unconstitutional Pain Criminal Justice
Appeals Court Says Ohio Execution Protocol Doesn’t Cause Unconstitutional Pain

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that just because an inmate feels like he’s being suffocated after a lethal injection, that doesn’t amount to cruel and unusual punishment. A three-judge panel of the court, sitting in Cincinnati, said a federal... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top