Blue Dogs Call for Bipartisan, Bicameral Effort to Secure US Elections
WASHINGTON – The co-chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition of security-focused House Democrats and the caucus’s National Security Task Force on Wednesday called on the leadership of both parties and both chambers to bring bipartisan election security legislation up for a vote.
In a letter addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the coalition leaders contend that with less than five months to go before the Iowa caucus and the start of primary voting across the U.S., “there is no time for partisan games.”
“In a divided government, the only way we can accomplish this vital task is to put politics aside and pursue bipartisan solutions that can pass a Democratic-led House and a Republican-led Senate, and go to a Republican President’s desk for a signature,” the letter says.
“Thankfully, members of both parties in both chambers of Congress have put forward viable, bipartisan solutions that, together, can address this threat to our national security in a holistic way,” it continues.
The lawmakers who signed the letter include Reps. Stephanie Murphy, of Florida, Blue Dog co-chair for administration; Tom O’Halleran, of Arizona, Blue Dog co-chair for policy; Lou Correa, of California, Blue Dog co-chair for communications; Anthony Brindisi, of New York, Blue Dog co-chair for whip; Kurt Schrader, of Oregon, Blue Dog co-chair; and Kendra Horn, of Oklahoma, and Jeff Van Drew, of New Jersey, co-chairs of the Blue Dog Task Force on National Security.
The bipartisan legislation to which they refer includes:
- H.R. 2592, Honest Ads Act;
- H.R. 2135, Preventing Adversaries Internationally from Disbursing Advertising Dollars (PAID AD) Act;
- S. 1692, Invest in Our Democracy Act of 2019;
- S. 482, Defending American Security from Kremlin Aggression (DASKA) Act of 2019;
- S. 1060, Defending Elections from Threats by Establishing Redlines (DETER) Act of 2019;
- S. 825, Protect Our Elections Act;
- H.R. 1272, Restoring Integrity to America’s Elections Act;
- H.R. 3529, Achieving Lasting Electoral Reforms on Transparency and Security (ALERTS) Act;
- S. 1328, Defending Elections against Trolls from Enemy Regimes (DETER) Act; and
- H.R. 1474, Strengthening Elections Through Intelligence Act.
In June, the Blue Dog Coalition released a package of legislative proposals in response to the conclusions presented in Volume I of the Mueller Report regarding Russia’s attack against the U.S. political system and attempts to interfere in the 2016 election.
The solutions are based primarily on a set of 11 bills endorsed by the Coalition and have earned bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate. The Blue Dog proposal was widely praised by leaders, policy experts and policy organizations.
In their letter, the lawmakers note that this past summer, the House has passed the SAFE Act; the Senate Intelligence Committee issued a bipartisan report outlining Russia’s efforts against U.S. election infrastructure and proposing solutions that have earned bipartisan support; and leaders in the intelligence community have continued to sound the alarm that Russia and other adversaries will meddle in the 2020 election.
“Every single Member of Congress has sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic,” the letter says. “It is our sacred duty to uphold that oath to our country. As leaders of both chambers of Congress, we call on you to immediately launch a bipartisan, bicameral effort to bring these solutions and other viable ideas that have passed either chamber to the floor for a vote upon returning from the district work period.
“A lack of action by Congress to secure our elections would embolden our adversaries and pose a danger to the national security of the United States. Americans must have confidence in the security of our country’s electoral process in order to ensure full faith in every election’s result, no matter the outcome,” the letter concludes.
In The News
WASHINGTON - Every month an email from the Federal Election Commission arrives in the inbox with a certain insouciant inevitability. "Pending advisory opinion requests," it says. "That's right," you say to yourself. "They're back to not having a quorum on the commission board." It's never a... Read More
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump frequently says there’s a difference between absentee voting, which he once called “good” in a tweet, and mail-in voting, which he has called “inaccurate and fraudulent.” But the people who run elections don’t make that distinction. Though the terms vary from... Read More
WASHINGTON — New York Democratic Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney has won her primary after six weeks of vote counting in the 12th District. New York City Board of Elections spokeswoman Valerie Vazquez confirmed Tuesday night that the board certified Maloney as the primary winner. The board... Read More
NEW YORK — At least one hotly contested New York primary election is still up in the air thanks to a federal court ruling this week that readmitted thousands of mail-in ballots thrown out because of missing postmarks. The Monday night ruling from Manhattan Federal Court... Read More
Kim Wyman’s phone started ringing at the end of February. As the rapid spread of the coronavirus made it clear that the 2020 election cycle would have to accommodate social distancing, reporters and election officials across the country started reaching out to Washington’s two-term secretary of... Read More
WASHINGTON -- Security systems for mail-in ballots need additional funding and information technology assistance to be ready for the upcoming November election, security experts told Congress Tuesday. They warned that foreign adversaries and other hackers will try to influence the election unless they can be blocked... Read More