Blue Dogs Call for Bipartisan, Bicameral Effort to Secure US Elections
WASHINGTON – The co-chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition of security-focused House Democrats and the caucus’s National Security Task Force on Wednesday called on the leadership of both parties and both chambers to bring bipartisan election security legislation up for a vote.
In a letter addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the coalition leaders contend that with less than five months to go before the Iowa caucus and the start of primary voting across the U.S., “there is no time for partisan games.”
“In a divided government, the only way we can accomplish this vital task is to put politics aside and pursue bipartisan solutions that can pass a Democratic-led House and a Republican-led Senate, and go to a Republican President’s desk for a signature,” the letter says.
“Thankfully, members of both parties in both chambers of Congress have put forward viable, bipartisan solutions that, together, can address this threat to our national security in a holistic way,” it continues.
The lawmakers who signed the letter include Reps. Stephanie Murphy, of Florida, Blue Dog co-chair for administration; Tom O’Halleran, of Arizona, Blue Dog co-chair for policy; Lou Correa, of California, Blue Dog co-chair for communications; Anthony Brindisi, of New York, Blue Dog co-chair for whip; Kurt Schrader, of Oregon, Blue Dog co-chair; and Kendra Horn, of Oklahoma, and Jeff Van Drew, of New Jersey, co-chairs of the Blue Dog Task Force on National Security.
The bipartisan legislation to which they refer includes:
- H.R. 2592, Honest Ads Act;
- H.R. 2135, Preventing Adversaries Internationally from Disbursing Advertising Dollars (PAID AD) Act;
- S. 1692, Invest in Our Democracy Act of 2019;
- S. 482, Defending American Security from Kremlin Aggression (DASKA) Act of 2019;
- S. 1060, Defending Elections from Threats by Establishing Redlines (DETER) Act of 2019;
- S. 825, Protect Our Elections Act;
- H.R. 1272, Restoring Integrity to America’s Elections Act;
- H.R. 3529, Achieving Lasting Electoral Reforms on Transparency and Security (ALERTS) Act;
- S. 1328, Defending Elections against Trolls from Enemy Regimes (DETER) Act; and
- H.R. 1474, Strengthening Elections Through Intelligence Act.
In June, the Blue Dog Coalition released a package of legislative proposals in response to the conclusions presented in Volume I of the Mueller Report regarding Russia’s attack against the U.S. political system and attempts to interfere in the 2016 election.
The solutions are based primarily on a set of 11 bills endorsed by the Coalition and have earned bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate. The Blue Dog proposal was widely praised by leaders, policy experts and policy organizations.
In their letter, the lawmakers note that this past summer, the House has passed the SAFE Act; the Senate Intelligence Committee issued a bipartisan report outlining Russia’s efforts against U.S. election infrastructure and proposing solutions that have earned bipartisan support; and leaders in the intelligence community have continued to sound the alarm that Russia and other adversaries will meddle in the 2020 election.
“Every single Member of Congress has sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic,” the letter says. “It is our sacred duty to uphold that oath to our country. As leaders of both chambers of Congress, we call on you to immediately launch a bipartisan, bicameral effort to bring these solutions and other viable ideas that have passed either chamber to the floor for a vote upon returning from the district work period.
“A lack of action by Congress to secure our elections would embolden our adversaries and pose a danger to the national security of the United States. Americans must have confidence in the security of our country’s electoral process in order to ensure full faith in every election’s result, no matter the outcome,” the letter concludes.
In The News
Given the massive media attention it receives every four years as home to the first-in-the-nation presidential primary, it's sometimes easy to forget that New Hampshire is also a swing state. For decades, polling has shown independent-minded New Hampshirites are nearly always evenly split on which presidential... Read More
SAN JOSE, Calif. — The 2020 presidential hopefuls have bashed Facebook for its record of playing loose with user data, allowing political ads that spread lies and letting foreign actors mislead voters — and yet, they can’t get enough of the social media juggernaut. Facebook ads... Read More
WASHINGTON - Even among battleground states, Wisconsin is considered special; a study in political contrasts if ever there was one. It went for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, flipped to Donald Trump in 2016 by the narrowest of margins -- just 0.77% -- then turned... Read More
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide an issue that could have a profound effect on the outcome of the 2020 election -- whether members of the Electoral College can defy their state's choice for president and cast a vote for someone else.... Read More
DETROIT — Two Michigan elections experts have some record-breaking predictions for 2020 that could end up putting Michigan in a potentially embarrassing national spotlight. Chris Thomas, the former Michigan director of elections at the Secretary of State’s Office, said Michigan is on track for a record-breaking... Read More
PHILADELPHIA — Early voting is coming to Pennsylvania in time for the presidential election. Sort of. Under a new law, people will have the option of requesting and submitting an absentee ballot during one in-person visit to county elections offices, starting more than a month and... Read More