All Texas Voters Eligible to Vote by Mail Amid Coronavirus, Federal Judge Rules

May 20, 2020by Tessa Weinberg, Fort Worth Star-Telegram (TNS)
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has asked the Texas Supreme Court to order county elections officials to reject mail-in ballots for voters who fear exposure to COVID019. (Nick Wagner/The Austin American-Statesman/TNS)

AUSTIN, Texas — A federal judge ruled Tuesday that all Texas voters are eligible to vote by mail to avoid contracting the novel coronavirus amid the pandemic.

U.S. District Judge Fred Biery sided with the Texas Democractic Party in his ruling Tuesday, and agreed that a fear of contracting the virus will limit citizens’ rights to vote in-person and a lack of immunity to COVID-19 “is indeed a physical condition.” Biery’s ruling allows voters under the age of 65 who would normally be ineligible for a mail-in ballot under Texas law to qualify for one.

“One’s right to vote should not be elusively based on the whims of nature. Citizens should have the option to choose voting by letter carrier versus voting with disease carriers,” Biery wrote in his ruling. “ ‘We the People’ get just about the government and political leaders we deserve, but deserve to have a safe and unfettered vote to say what we get.”

Biery heard arguments in the preliminary injunction hearing Friday in San Antonio, and his ruling is the latest in a slew of legal challenges in both state and federal courts challenging Texas’ vote-by-mail laws and restrictions. Civil rights groups and voters have raised concerns over voters flocking to potentially crowded polling places amid the outbreak to cast their ballot.

In order to qualify to vote by mail under Texas law, voters must submit an application and be 65 or older, disabled, out of the county on Election Day and during in-person early voting, or be eligible to vote but confined in jail.

The Texas Democratic Party argued that the current election conditions are unconstitutional and violate the 26th Amendment by discriminating against voters who are under 65. It was a point Biery said they were likely to succeed in proving, citing that Texas’ vote-by-mail statute provides for the health and safety of voters over 65 without a disability, “but not those 64 years, 364 days and younger.”

“Today is a victory for all Texans. The right to vote is central to our democracy,” Texas Democratic Party Chair Gilberto Hinojosa said in a statement Tuesday celebrating the decision. “It is time for a few state officers to stop trying to force people to expose themselves to COVID-19 in order to vote.”

In a statement Tuesday night, Attorney General Ken Paxton vowed to appeal the ruling.

“The district court’s opinion ignores the evidence and disregards well-established law. We will seek immediate review by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals,” Paxton said.

Attorneys representing the state had argued that the issue should first be settled in state courts and had requested that Biery wait to first see how the Texas Supreme Court rules in the Texas Democratic Party’s lawsuit filed in state district court.

On Friday, Paxton had urged the Texas Supreme Court to immediately stay the 14th Court of Appeals 2-1 decision that upheld a lower court’s ruling. In April, state district Judge Tim Sulak issued a temporary injunction allowing Texans who lack immunity to the novel coronavirus to cite the disability category under state law in order to request a mail-in ballot.

Paxton had said that his appeal of Sulak’s ruling meant the order was stayed — a point civil rights groups and organizations suing the state had pushed back on. The Texas Supreme Court sided with Paxton, and issued an emergency stay while it considered the issue. The Texas Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in the case Wednesday afternoon.

Gov. Greg Abbott told KVUE-TV Tuesday that he thinks both cases “are going to wind up in the U.S. Supreme Court pretty quickly.”

Paxton has repeatedly argued that while a person ill with COVID-19 would qualify for a mail-in ballot, a fear of contracting the virus would not meet the state’s eligibility requirements. And he has warned local officials that they could be subject to criminal sanctions if they advise voters who normally aren’t eligible to apply for mail-in ballots.

However, Biery wrote that Paxton’s recent interpretations render Texas’ vote-by-mail statute “vague” and makes it unclear as to which voters do qualify under the law. Biery said that given Paxton’s public statements, the Texas Democratic Party was likely to succeed in its claim that Paxton’s actions resulted in voter intimidation.

Attorneys for the state had also argued that allowing an expansion of mail-in ballot eligibility amid the pandemic would lead to an increase in voter fraud. During the hearing, Biery had questioned why allow mail-in ballots at all if that was the case.

Biery wrote in his ruling that in previous cases, the evidence had shown “there is no widespread voter fraud” and noted that his order will not prevent the Texas secretary of state or local election officials from prosecuting cases of voter fraud “where evidence and probable cause exist.”

Abbott had previously postponed the May 26 primary runoff elections to July 14, and recently extended the early voting period by a week to start on June 29.

Attorneys for the state had argued that officials were taking the necessary precautions to ensure voters’ safety, and that the extension of early voting will provide Texans with more opportunities to cast their ballot and prevent overcrowding at polling places. The Texas Democratic Party’s attorney had pushed back on the state’s plans, and said they would result in a “survival of the fittest election.”

Biery noted that it was found people in Wisconsin contracted the virus at the polls, and that “medical professionals in even the most carefully monitored medical environments have fallen ill and died from virus infections.”


©2020 Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

2020 Elections

Republicans Push Back on Democrats’ DC Statehood Bill
Political News
Republicans Push Back on Democrats’ DC Statehood Bill

WASHINGTON — Republican senators came out swinging Wednesday against a bill passed in the House last week that would make the District of Columbia the 51st state. “From a South Carolina point of view, this is a very bad deal,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told... Read More

Billionaires’ Political Spending Grew 37-Fold in 10 Years
Campaign Finance
Billionaires’ Political Spending Grew 37-Fold in 10 Years

WASHINGTON — Billionaires gave 37 times as much in political contributions in the last election as they did 10 years earlier, according to a new study. During the 2018 election cycle, billionaires gave $611 million, up from $17 million in 2008, according to the report from... Read More

Effort to Crack Big Tech’s Legal Shield Gains Bipartisan Momentum in Senate
Social Media
Effort to Crack Big Tech’s Legal Shield Gains Bipartisan Momentum in Senate

WASHINGTON — Bipartisan support for a pair of Senate bills that would force social media companies such as Facebook and Twitter to change their content moderation policies could mark a turning point in Washington’s ongoing efforts to maintain greater control over Silicon Valley. Both Republicans and... Read More

House Clears Bill Extending Loan Program for Small Businesses to Aug. 8
House Clears Bill Extending Loan Program for Small Businesses to Aug. 8

WASHINGTON — A day after the Senate passed a last-minute extension of the Paycheck Protection Program loan application deadline, the House did the same Wednesday, clearing the bill for the president.  Somewhat unexpectedly, the Senate by unanimous consent passed a bill on Tuesday from Sen. Benjamin... Read More

Passing Infrastructure Bill, Democrats Go All-In on Climate
Passing Infrastructure Bill, Democrats Go All-In on Climate

WASHINGTON — The $1.5 trillion infrastructure bill the House passed 233-188 Wednesday has little chance of advancing in the Republican-controlled Senate. But it fired a political warning shot: Democrats view climate change as a top issue for an already turbulent election year. “This bill, as audacious... Read More

New Trade Accord Between US, Canada and Mexico Goes Into Effect
New Trade Accord Between US, Canada and Mexico Goes Into Effect
July 1, 2020
by Dan McCue

WASHINGTON - It's NAFTA no more. As of 12:01 this morning, the U.S. - Mexico - Canada trade agreement, better known as the USMCA, is in full effect, formally replacing the 26-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement "Today marks the beginning of a new and better... Read More

News From The Well
scroll top