Supreme Court Hints at New Limits on Authority of Federal Agencies

November 8, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Supreme Court Hints at New Limits on Authority of Federal Agencies
A crowd gathers outside the U.S. Supreme Court. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — U.S. Supreme Court justices implied Monday they are likely to make it easier to challenge the authority of regulatory agencies in disputes with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission.

The key issue in Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission was whether people and companies must wait for agencies’ administrative rulings or whether they can take their claims straight to federal court.

Under current case law, federal agencies have some discretion to set their own procedures to challenge their orders, fines or actions. The breadth of the Supreme Court ruling in the Axon case is likely to spread far beyond the FTC, according to legal experts.

“The court’s holding could potentially open the door to constitutional challenges to any federal agency’s administrative hearing procedures,” Tom Johnson, a partner at Washington, D.C.’s Wiley Law, told The Well News.

The issue is reaching the Supreme Court now because “these agencies have become increasingly aggressive in their regulatory efforts, in part because of their unaccountable structure,” said Johnson, who is a former general counsel for the Federal Communications Commission.

Axon, an Arizona company that makes police body cameras, argued that Article III of the Constitution gives federal courts “original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution.”

As a result, it should be able to bypass the delays that could come from an agency’s administrative procedures.

The Federal Trade Commission was investigating Axon to determine whether its $13 million acquisition of a competitor would violate antitrust laws.

When Axon protested, the FTC required that it argue its complaint in an agency hearing and await its ruling.

“Rather than resign itself to the ongoing unconstitutional injuries inflicted by the FTC’s process, [Axon] filed suit in district court seeking to enjoin the unconstitutional FTC proceedings,” Axon’s petition to the Supreme Court says.

The FTC said its authority was derived from the jurisdiction Congress gave it when the agency was established. Its attorneys argued they properly followed federal law under the Administrative Procedure Act.

The FTC filed a “cease and desist” order with the U.S. District Court, which the court upheld. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the district court, which prompted Axon’s appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Axon dispute was one of two cases the Supreme Court heard Monday to define the limits of agency authority.

The other dealt with a similar issue when Texas accountant Michelle Cochran was accused of misconduct in the case of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cochran. Cochran argued she should be allowed to take her complaint to federal court rather than be subjected to SEC agency procedures.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with her, which led the SEC to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Her attorney, Gregory G. Garre, implied the SEC has a conflict of interest in first sanctioning Cochran and then ruling on her appeal.

“The SEC acts as prosecutor, judge and, in effect, executioner in its own proceedings, all of which give it an extraordinary home court advantage,” Garre said.

Justice Samuel A. Alito seemed to agree when he asked, “What sense does it make for a claim that goes to the very structure of the agency having to go through the administrative process?”

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. mentioned that government agencies have lost several recent cases that opposed their administrative hearing procedures.

“Doesn’t that underscore the need for a direct proceeding to raise the constitutional claim rather than waiting however many years before the agency?” Roberts asked.

Several recent Supreme Court decisions have cut back on federal agency authority.

In April, the Supreme Court said the FTC could no longer get court orders forcing companies to return illegal profits.

In June, the Supreme Court ruled the Environmental Protection Agency exceeded its regulatory authority on limiting greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2017, the Supreme Court restricted the SEC’s ability to win back money for investors from misbehaving corporations.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to release rulings in June in the cases of Axon Enterprise Inc. v. FTC, case number 21-86, and SEC v. Cochran, case number 21-1239.

Tom can be reached at [email protected] and @TomRamstack

A+
a-
  • regulation
  • regulatory agencies
  • Supreme Court
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Regulation

    Biden Announcing New Rule to Protect Consumers Who Purchase Short-Term Health Insurance Plans

    President Joe Biden on Thursday announced new steps to protect consumers who buy short-term health insurance plans that critics say amount to junk. A... Read More

    President Joe Biden on Thursday announced new steps to protect consumers who buy short-term health insurance plans that critics say amount to junk. A new rule finalized by the Democratic president's administration will limit these plans to just three months. And the plans can only be renewed for a maximum... Read More

    March 26, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Consumers Warned to Avoid Certain Topical Pain Relief Products 

    WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration warned consumers on Tuesday not to use certain over-the-counter pain relief products marketed... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration warned consumers on Tuesday not to use certain over-the-counter pain relief products marketed for topical use before, during or after certain cosmetic procedures. The warning came after the agency issued warning letters to six companies for marketing these products... Read More

    March 21, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    DOJ, 16 States Sue Apple Over Alleged Smartphone Monopoly

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department and 16 state attorneys general sued Apple on Thursday accusing the Cupertino, California-based tech giant... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department and 16 state attorneys general sued Apple on Thursday accusing the Cupertino, California-based tech giant of operating an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market. According to the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in New Jersey, Apple has used the... Read More

    Trump Suggests He'd Support a National Ban on Abortions Around 15 Weeks of Pregnancy

    NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump suggested Tuesday that he’d support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks of pregnancy, voicing... Read More

    NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump suggested Tuesday that he’d support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks of pregnancy, voicing for the first time support for a specific limit on the procedure. The Republican former president has taken credit for striking down a federally guaranteed right... Read More

    March 15, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    EPA Sets Tougher Limits on Gas Used to Sterilize Medical Devices

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday finalized tougher restrictions on ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing gas commonly used to... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday finalized tougher restrictions on ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing gas commonly used to sterilize medical devices. The new standards specifically target commercial sterilization facilities. The agency called them “the strongest measures in U.S. history to reduce emissions of EtO,”... Read More

    March 15, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    EPA Proposes New Limits on Gas Distribution Facilities

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday finalized a rule strengthening toxic air pollution standards at gasoline distribution facilities,... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday finalized a rule strengthening toxic air pollution standards at gasoline distribution facilities, including storage tanks, loading operations and equipment leaks.  The action — from which gas stations are exempt — is expected to reduce emissions of air toxics,... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top