Supreme Court to Hear Case on State Authority Over Elections

June 30, 2022 by Dan McCue
Supreme Court to Hear Case on State Authority Over Elections
Phil Strach, an attorney for Republican legislators, questions state Rep. Destin Hall, a top Republican redistricting official, during a partisan gerrymandering trial on Jan. 5, 2022, at Campbell University School of Law in Raleigh, N.C. (Travis Long/The News & Observer via AP, File)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear an appeal from North Carolina Republicans that could ultimately remove state court authority over congressional redistricting. 

If they decide for the petitioners in Moore v. Harper, the justices would dramatically limit when state courts could intervene, if at all, and order changes to district maps or federal elections.

The petition to the justices challenges a state court ruling earlier this year that threw out the congressional districts drawn by North Carolina’s General Assembly that made GOP candidates likely victors in 10 of the state’s 14 congressional districts.

Republican lawmakers told the Supreme Court that they believe the Constitution intends for legislative leaders, not the courts, to have the final say over elections law.

They want the justices to declare the North Carolina Supreme Court did not have the power to strike down the state’s congressional map as a partisan gerrymander in violation of the state constitution. 

They also want the high court to reinstate the 2021 congressional map that was found to be an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.

The Supreme Court has never weighed in on the concept known as the “independent state legislature doctrine,” a reading of the Constitution that would give state legislatures near-total control over the rules guiding elections, without state court interference or oversight.

A number of legal authorities, including the Brennan Center for Law, have labeled the doctrine “dubious” at best.

And the North Carolina Supreme Court itself has said the theory is “repugnant to the sovereignty of states, the authority of state constitutions, and the independence of state courts, and would produce absurd and dangerous consequences.”

Now, four of the court’s conservative justices, including Justice Clarence Thomas, who invoked the doctrine during Bush v. Gore, the case that settled the 2000 election, have signaled they’re interested in exploring the theory.

Some critics fear that if it is given any credibility by the high court, Republican-held legislatures in states that vote for a Democrat for president in 2024 might be able to use it to ignore the popular vote and give their Electoral College votes to the Republican candidate instead. 

Among those raising the alarm is former Attorney General Eric Holder, who now chairs the Democratic National Redistricting Foundation.

“The independent state legislature theory is a fringe legal theory based on a willful misinterpretation of the Constitution, and it is at odds with basic tenets of American government, including the separation of powers,” Holder said in a lengthy written statement.

“The goal of those embracing this radical theory is clear: to give control over our elections to extreme Republican state legislatures that are dominated by anti-democracy politicians who perpetuate and facilitate the Big Lie,” he said. 

“It should not be lost on the public that this is a desperate attempt to delegitimize the lawful decisions of neutral arbiters — state justices of both political parties who have provided a check against extreme laws enacted by gerrymandered Republican legislatures — all because Republicans did not like the end result,” Holder continued. “As shocking as this is, it is also unfortunately not surprising. The same political party that has called for the impeachment of state supreme court justices for holding them to account is now attacking the independence of state courts through the nation’s highest tribunal. 

“All of this underscores the fact that every election matters, and it is incumbent upon all of us to protect the true independence of the judiciary, which is critical to our democracy,” he concluded.

The case is expected to be heard in the fall.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and @DanMcCue

A+
a-
  • authority
  • Constitution
  • North Carolina
  • redistricting
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Redistricting

    December 26, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Strikes Down State Legislative Maps

    MADISON, Wis. — The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday struck down Republican-drawn legislative maps and ordered new district boundary lines... Read More

    MADISON, Wis. — The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday struck down Republican-drawn legislative maps and ordered new district boundary lines in the perennial battleground state to be drawn before the 2024 election. In its 4-3 ruling, the court majority held that scores of legislative districts woven... Read More

    December 12, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Court Sets Off ‘MapQuake’ in New York, Orders Redistricting Do-Over

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York’s highest court ordered the state to redraw its congressional map on Tuesday, ruling in favor... Read More

    ALBANY, N.Y. — New York’s highest court ordered the state to redraw its congressional map on Tuesday, ruling in favor of the plaintiffs in a Democratic lawsuit, and potentially increasing the odds that Democrats will take back control of the House after the 2024 election. The... Read More

    December 8, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Georgia Legislators Approve New Congressional District Map

    ATLANTA — The Georgia Legislature on Thursday gave its approval to a new congressional district map that adds a Black... Read More

    ATLANTA — The Georgia Legislature on Thursday gave its approval to a new congressional district map that adds a Black majority district west of Atlanta but appears to dilute the district currently represented by Democratic Rep. Lucy McBath. The adoption of the map came just a... Read More

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Questions Timing of Redistricting Challenge Seeking New Maps for 2024

    MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Conservative justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court questioned why it was being asked Tuesday to overturn... Read More

    MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Conservative justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court questioned why it was being asked Tuesday to overturn Republican-drawn legislative maps in a redistricting case that Democrats hope will result in new, more favorable legislative maps for elections in 2024. The lawsuit was brought by Democratic... Read More

    Judge Finds Voting Rights Act Violation in North Dakota Redistricting for Two Tribes

    BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota's 2021 legislative redistricting plan violates the rights of two Native American tribes because it... Read More

    BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota's 2021 legislative redistricting plan violates the rights of two Native American tribes because it dilutes their voting strength, a federal judge ruled Friday. U.S. District Chief Judge Peter Welte said the redrawn legislative districts violated the Voting Rights Act of... Read More

    November 13, 2023
    by Dan McCue
    Louisiana Lawmakers Told to Come Up With New District Map

    NEW ORLEANS — A federal appeals court on Friday held that the latest iteration of Louisiana’s congressional district map continues... Read More

    NEW ORLEANS — A federal appeals court on Friday held that the latest iteration of Louisiana’s congressional district map continues to likely violate the Voting Rights Act by diluting the power of Black voters. The decision handed down by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S.... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top