Rudy Giuliani Slapped With Ethics Charge Over Baseless Election Lawsuit

June 11, 2022 by Dan McCue
Rudy Giuliani Slapped With Ethics Charge Over Baseless Election Lawsuit
This image released by Campfire Studios shows former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani in a scene from the documentary "Rudy! A Documusical." (Campfire Studios via AP)

WASHINGTON — Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a hero after 9/11, has been slapped with ethics charges by the disciplinary office of the D.C. Court of Appeals over claims he made in a federal lawsuit seeking to overturn the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania.

In a complaint filed on Monday, disciplinary counsel for the court’s Board of Professional Responsibility allege Giuliani “brought a proceeding and asserted issues therein without a non-frivolous basis in law and fact for doing so, and engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.”

Both claims are violations of the Pennsylvania rules of professional conduct. The matter is of interest in the District of Columbia because Giuliani has been a member of the bar of the D.C. Court of Appeals since 1976.

Giuliani filed the lawsuit underlying the ethics complaint in his role as personal attorney to former President Donald Trump.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Trump and a group of Pennsylvania voters, claimed that elections officials in some counties allowed mail-in voters to cure problems with their ballots by casting provisional ballots, while other counties did not.

Giuliani argued this select application of election rules violated the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection, and asked that millions of votes be tossed in a pivotal swing state in the 2020 election.

Two weeks after the election, U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann dismissed the case, holding the complaint was a “strained legal argument without merit.”

Brann went on to note that what Giuliani and the Trump campaign were asking him to do was to “disenfranchise almost seven million voters” from the bench.

He noted that in considering the request and reviewing case law, he could not find one example in which a plaintiff has asked for “such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election.”

Brann went on to say that any judge would have expected someone making such a bold request to have a compelling legal argument to back up their assertions.

In this case, the judge said, all the court was presented with were “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.”

“In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state,” Brann wrote.

Lastly, Brann said, while the Trump team sought to discredit scores of voters in specific counties, it did so only for one race — the presidential contest.

“This is simply not how the Constitution works,” he wrote.

The Trump team appealed the ruling to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which denied Giuliani’s request to file a second amended complaint.

At the time, Giuliani wasn’t a member of the bar for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, where the litigation was filed, but was admitted pro hac vice, meaning he was allowed to participate in this particular case.

Once involved, writes disciplinary counsel Hamilton Fox III and assistant disciplinary counsel Jason Horrell, Giuliani made several “extraordinary” claims including that state elections officials had engaged in a “premeditated” and “planned” effort to “steal the election … in this Commonwealth.”

He also made several requests for relief ranging from barring elections officials from certifying the election results to declaring the results invalid and allowing Pennsylvania’s Republican-controlled General Assembly to choose the state’s electors to simply declaring Donald Trump the winner of the legal votes cast in Pennsylvania.

“Respondent had no non-frivolous basis in law and fact for asserting to the district court that the defendants committed election fraud, much less a factual basis for setting forth fraud with particularity … [and] cited … several sources that could not, as a categorical matter, prove that the defendants committed or facilitated election fraud during the 2020 elections,” Fox and Horrell wrote.

The complaint does not spell out the relief Fox and Horrell are seeking, leaving it to the disciplinary panel to decide.

Last year, the D.C. Court of Appeals suspended Giuliani from practicing law in Washington pending the outcome of a disciplinary proceeding in New York.

Giuliani’s license to practice law in New York was suspended in June 2021, over his having allegedly made “false and misleading statements” about the election loss of former President Trump.

The suspension in New York is temporary, pending the outcome of a full formal disciplinary hearing.

The Well News attempted to reach out to Giuliani’s lawyer, Arthur Aidala, for comment. This story will be updated if and when he replies.

Dan can be reached at [email protected] and at https://twitter.com/DanMcCue.

A+
a-
  • Board of Professional Responsibility
  • D.C. Court of Appeals
  • ethics
  • Rudy Giuliani
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Law

    March 25, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    DC Attorney General Warns Sports Teams About Relocating to Virginia

    WASHINGTON — The District of Columbia’s attorney general is invoking a contract provision with local professional sports teams in the... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The District of Columbia’s attorney general is invoking a contract provision with local professional sports teams in the city’s latest bid to keep them from relocating to Northern Virginia. D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb told Monumental Sports and Entertainment in a letter last week... Read More

    March 22, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Judge Upholds DC Law Giving Noncitizens Voting Rights

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Thursday against the District of Columbia Board of Elections that sought to... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Thursday against the District of Columbia Board of Elections that sought to invalidate a law giving noncitizens a right to vote in local elections. The Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act would allow anyone who is a resident... Read More

    March 20, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Trump Wins Right of Appeal to Try to Disqualify Georgia Prosecutor

    ATLANTA — Former President Donald Trump is getting another chance to exclude a prosecutor he accused of political reprisal in... Read More

    ATLANTA — Former President Donald Trump is getting another chance to exclude a prosecutor he accused of political reprisal in his upcoming criminal trial in Atlanta on charges of illegally trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election vote count in Georgia. Trump asked the judge overseeing... Read More

    Pro-Trump Michigan Attorney Arrested After Hearing in DC Over Leaking Dominion Documents

    An attorney facing criminal charges for illegally accessing Michigan voting machines after the 2020 election was arrested Monday after a... Read More

    An attorney facing criminal charges for illegally accessing Michigan voting machines after the 2020 election was arrested Monday after a hearing in a separate case in federal court in Washington, D.C. Stefanie Lambert was arrested by U.S. Marshals after a hearing over possible sanctions against her... Read More

    March 15, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Fani Willis Can Continue Case Against Trump With Single Condition, Judge Rules

    ATLANTA — Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis can continue to pursue an election interference case against former President Donald... Read More

    ATLANTA — Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis can continue to pursue an election interference case against former President Donald Trump and several others — as long as the prosecutor with whom she had a romantic relationship steps aside, a judge in Georgia ruled on Friday.... Read More

    March 13, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Georgia Judge Dismisses Some Charges Against Trump

    ATLANTA — Former President Donald Trump and his co-defendants facing criminal prosecution in Georgia for trying to overturn the 2020... Read More

    ATLANTA — Former President Donald Trump and his co-defendants facing criminal prosecution in Georgia for trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election won a partial court victory Wednesday. A Georgia judge dismissed six of the 41 charges against the former president and his accused fellow conspirators.... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top