Supreme Court Takes Case of Warhol Portrait to Determine Copyright Infringement

March 29, 2022 by Tom Ramstack
Supreme Court Takes Case of Warhol Portrait to Determine Copyright Infringement
In this 1976 file photo, pop artist Andy Warhol smiles in New York. The Supreme Court has agreed to review a copyright dispute involving works of art by Warhol and a photographer who took an image of the musician Prince that the works are based on. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to review a case to determine whether artist Andy Warhol violated a photographer’s copyright by basing one of his artworks on a photograph of the musician Prince.

Both Warhol and Prince are deceased but photographer Lynn Goldsmith says the copyright on her photograph should allow her to share the financial benefits of Warhol’s artwork.

The silkscreen portrait depicts a somber image of Prince’s face that The Andy Warhol Foundation describes as “transformative” compared with Goldsmith’s photograph.

Under U.S. copyright law, transformative use or transformation of copyrighted material refers to a fair use that builds on the copyrighted work in a different manner or for a different purpose than the original. It is not considered a copyright infringement.

Goldsmith argues the Prince image is too close to her original photograph to be anything other than a copyright violation. Warhol called the 1984 portrait “Orange Prince.”

Implications of the Supreme Court ruling are likely to reach deep into the art world, where artists commonly try to build on popular images.

The case is reaching the Supreme Court now because Goldsmith found out about the Warhol artwork and sued after Prince died in 2016.

Warhol died in 1987. Although he is gone, his estate and The Andy Warhol Foundation continue to get payments from royalties on his artworks.

The trial court ruled in favor of The Andy Warhol Foundation. The judge agreed Warhol’s silkscreen was derived from the Goldsmith photograph but said Warhol transformed it from a photo showing a “vulnerable, uncomfortable person” into a portrait of “an iconic, larger-than-life figure.”

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York disagreed.

Its ruling, written by Judge Gerard Lynch, said the lower court judge emphasized the subjective meaning of the portrait rather than using an objective standard to determine copyright infringement.

“The secondary work’s transformative purpose and character must, at a bare minimum, comprise something more than the imposition of another artist’s style on the primary work,” the appeals court decision said.

It added, “There can be no reasonable debate that the works are substantially similar. Any reasonable viewer with access to a range of such photographs including the Goldsmith photograph would have no difficulty identifying the latter as the source material for Warhol’s Prince Series.”

The Supreme Court is taking on the case to clear up confusion between the different opinions from the trial and appellate courts.

Case precedent from earlier Supreme Court decisions, including the 2021 case of Google v. Oracle, appears to conflict with the 2nd Circuit appellate ruling. The Supreme Court said artwork is transformative if it conveys a different meaning or message from the source material.

“Orange Prince” was one of several silkscreens in which Warhol used bright orange to draw renewed attention to his subjects. Others include “Orange Marilyn” of actress Marilyn Monroe, “Orange Car Crash” and “Orange Little Electric Chair.”

Goldsmith said in a statement last year after the 2nd Circuit ruling, “I fought this suit to protect not only my own rights, but the rights of all photographers and visual artists to make a living by licensing their creative work — and also to decide when, how, and even whether to exploit their creative works or license others to do so.”

The case is The Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, case number 21-869, in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Tom can be reached at [email protected]

A+
a-
  • Andy Warhol
  • copyright infringment
  • Prince
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Litigation

    March 28, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Disney World Settles with Florida After Its Opposition to 'Don’t Say Gay' Law

    ORLANDO — The company that runs Walt Disney World reached a settlement Wednesday with appointees of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis... Read More

    ORLANDO — The company that runs Walt Disney World reached a settlement Wednesday with appointees of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis who were exerting controversial regulatory control over the huge tourism complex. The settlement resolves some of the disputes that arose after Disney officials publicly denounced the... Read More

    March 14, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Jewish Group Sues UN Relief Agency Saying It Supports Hamas Terrorism

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A Jewish advocacy group sued a United Nations relief agency Wednesday in Delaware for allegedly helping Hamas... Read More

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A Jewish advocacy group sued a United Nations relief agency Wednesday in Delaware for allegedly helping Hamas in its war with Israel and the murders of Israelis and Americans. The National Jewish Advocacy Center says U.N. relief workers who were supposed to be... Read More

    New York AG Says She’ll Seize Trump’s Property if He Can’t Pay $454M Civil Fraud Debt

    NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump could be at risk of losing some of his prized properties if he can’t... Read More

    NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump could be at risk of losing some of his prized properties if he can’t pay his staggering New York civil fraud penalty. With interest, he owes the state nearly $454 million — and the amount is going up $87,502 each day until... Read More

    February 16, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Environmentalists Sue EPA for Data on Health Risks of Forever Chemicals

    WASHINGTON — Environmentalists sued the Environmental Protection Agency this week in federal court in Washington, D.C., seeking information about health... Read More

    WASHINGTON — Environmentalists sued the Environmental Protection Agency this week in federal court in Washington, D.C., seeking information about health risks from forever chemicals in fluorinated plastic containers. The two groups that sued accuse the EPA of withholding information about PFAS. They are called forever chemicals... Read More

    February 6, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    DC Appellate Court Rejects Trump's Immunity Claim

    WASHINGTON — A court of appeals in the District of Columbia has rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim that he... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A court of appeals in the District of Columbia has rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from prosecution for allegedly interfering in the 2020 presidential election. In a unanimous, 57-page ruling, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of... Read More

    February 1, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Trump Lawsuit Over Steele Dossier Dismissed by Judge in London

    LONDON, U.K. — A judge in London dismissed a lawsuit Thursday that former President Donald Trump filed against the British... Read More

    LONDON, U.K. — A judge in London dismissed a lawsuit Thursday that former President Donald Trump filed against the British intelligence agent who wrote the "Steele Dossier" describing his questionable links to the Russian government. Trump’s lawsuit called the accusations lies that hurt his reputation. Judge... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top