Jurisdictional Question Revived in Suits Over Coastal Loss

August 6, 2021 by Dan McCue
Jurisdictional Question Revived in Suits Over Coastal Loss
The mobile offshore drilling unit Development Driller III (near) is prepared to drill a relief well at the Deepwater Horizon site May 18, 2010, as the MODU Q4000 holds position directly over the damaged blowout preventer. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Patrick Kelley.)

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The question of whether lawsuits blaming big oil companies for loss of vulnerable Louisiana coastal wetlands will be tried in state courts, as local parish governments want, or in federal courts, as the oil companies want, has been revived by a federal appeals panel.

Thursday’s ruling at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans was a partial victory for the oil companies and a partial reversal of a decision the same court made a year ago. But a lead attorney for parishes suing the oil companies claimed victory, too, saying the decision effectively means at least 15 of the 42 lawsuits still face state trials — and the remainder could, too, pending more federal court review.

“The decision is in our favor,” lawyer John Carmouche said.

In August 2020, a panel of three 5th Circuit judges upheld federal district judges’ rulings keeping the issue in state court, where coastal parishes’ attorneys want them tried. But the oil companies pressed for reconsideration. Arguments were heard in October, and Judge James Ho, author of the 2020 opinion, wrote Thursday that the district courts should take another look.

Thursday’s new ruling came in lawsuits filed by Cameron and Plaquemines parishes against oil companies including BP America, Chevron USA, Exxon-Mobil and Shell. But it has implications for all of the more than 40 lawsuits brought by six parishes and New Orleans. The overarching issue in the suits is whether the oil companies can be held responsible for allegedly contributing to decades of coastal erosion and the loss of wetlands. 

But the cases, some of which date to 2013, have bogged down in jurisdictional questions. Oil companies want the cases in federal court. Attorneys for the parishes say the disputes are over state regulations. Carmouche has called the effort to have the suits moved to federal court a delaying tactic.

The latest jurisdiction question turns largely on whether a report filed by one of the parishes in the case contained what the oil companies said was new information that might warrant removal to federal court. The report said some of the wells involved in the lawsuits were drilled during World War II while the companies were acting under the authority of a federal wartime agency. 

Ho’s Thursday opinion noted oil company arguments that some of the state’s drilling regulations conflicted with federal drilling rules in place during the war. 

Carmouche, reached by phone Thursday, said more than 15 of the lawsuits don’t involve wartime activities and, under previous rulings that still stand, are ripe for trial in state courts. “The operations in those cases all began after World War II,” Carmouche said. 

He added that the other cases go back to two federal district judges who have already ruled that the cases don’t belong in federal court. 

A request for comment from a Louisiana oil industry group was not immediately returned Thursday. 

The wetlands in question are not only ecologically important to wildlife and fisheries but they also act as a kind of natural hurricane buffer to inland communities, including New Orleans. The companies’ dredging of coastal canals, use of earthen pits instead of steel tanks at well heads, and drilling methods are among the issues in the lawsuits. 

Oil companies have repeatedly called the suits frivolous, and an attack by money-seeking lawyers on an industry vital to Louisiana’s economy. 

A+
a-
  • coastal drilling
  • Gulf of Mexico
  • New Orleans
  • offshore oil and gas exploration
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Law

    April 16, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Supreme Court Divided on Law for Prosecuting Jan. 6 Rioters

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to throw out criminal charges of obstructing an official proceeding against Jan. 6 defendants, including former President Donald Trump. About 350 persons who invaded the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection have been charged... Read More

    Weedkiller Manufacturer Seeks Lawmakers' Help to Squelch Claims It Failed to Warn About Cancer

    DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Stung by paying billions of dollars for settlements and trials, chemical giant Bayer has been... Read More

    DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Stung by paying billions of dollars for settlements and trials, chemical giant Bayer has been lobbying lawmakers in three states to pass bills providing it a legal shield from lawsuits that claim its popular weedkiller Roundup causes cancer. Nearly identical bills... Read More

    April 15, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Judge Dismisses Most Prospective Jurors on First Day of Trump’s Hush Money Trial

    NEW YORK — Dozens of prospective jurors were dismissed Monday on the first day of jury selection for the hush... Read More

    NEW YORK — Dozens of prospective jurors were dismissed Monday on the first day of jury selection for the hush money trial of former President Donald Trump in New York City. He faces felony charges for allegedly paying $130,000 in 2016 to adult film actress Stormy... Read More

    April 12, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    US Office of Special Counsel Warns Federal Agencies About Gag Orders

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Office of Special Counsel sent an advisory this month to federal agencies warning them to be... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Office of Special Counsel sent an advisory this month to federal agencies warning them to be careful about trying to squelch employees’ right to complain about workplace issues. The advisory follows incidents in which supervisors overstepped their authority to enforce non-disclosure agreements... Read More

    April 8, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Senate Considers Clamping Down on Conservative Judge Shopping 

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate is considering legislation to stop judge shopping after a Texas federal judge rejected pleas to... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate is considering legislation to stop judge shopping after a Texas federal judge rejected pleas to revise his jurisdiction’s method for assigning cases. The threat to use legislation to force federal judges to follow a case assignment procedure recommended by the Judicial... Read More

    April 4, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Judge Rejects Trump Bid to Toss Classified Documents Case

    FORT PIERCE, Fla. — The federal judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case on Thursday rejected his bid... Read More

    FORT PIERCE, Fla. — The federal judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case on Thursday rejected his bid to dismiss the case based on the Presidential Records Act. In a court filing last month, attorneys representing the former president argued that the more than... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top