Judge Set to Rule on Immunity For Police at Lafayette Square

June 2, 2021 by Tom Ramstack
Judge Set to Rule on Immunity For Police at Lafayette Square

WASHINGTON — A Washington, D.C. federal judge is expected to rule within days on whether lawsuits can go forward accusing police of violating protesters’ civil rights in the way they cleared Lafayette Square in front of the White House last year after the killing of George Floyd.

The lawsuits are filed against former President Donald Trump, former Attorney General William Barr and local and federal police agencies. The Justice Department is seeking dismissal.

“We respectfully submit that the conduct here was so flagrantly unlawful and so obviously unconstitutional that it requires a remedy,” an attorney for the plaintiffs said at a hearing Friday. “And we are here today, your honor, to do everything we can to see that nothing like this ever happens again in our country.”

Police used tear gas, rubber bullets and flashbang grenades against protesters on June 1, 2020 to clear a path for Trump, who was on his way to a nearby church for a photo opportunity.

Trump was accompanied by some of his staff members, such as Barr and Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Since then, Milley has apologized for participating in the photo op.

Barr and the police argue they cannot be sued because they are protected by a qualified immunity from lawsuits granted by federal law to government officials.

The only exception — and the issue before the U.S. District Court — allows lawsuits when police violate “clearly established” law.

At times, U.S. District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich seemed skeptical of the police action when she pointed out the protesters were peaceful and added, “You just can’t wail on someone with batons if they’re running away from you.”

Justice Department attorney John Martin argued, “Presidential security is paramount. No officer has ever been denied immunity for clearing an area before an appearance by the president.”

Other times, the judge seemed to agree that what she called a “legitimate security risk” justified police in forcibly removing the protesters.

“It seems quite obvious you have to clear the square that he’s going to walk through before he reaches the church,” said Friedrich, who was a Trump appointee. “And why is that not reasonable for the defendants to do?”

The defense attorneys also said the case is moot because Trump has been replaced by a new president who never would authorize such force against protesters.

In recognition of the argument presented by the protesters’ attorneys, Friedrich added, “I understand your separate point about the level of violence and use of force.” 

The protesters were represented by the ACLU of the District of Columbia, Black Lives Matter D.C. and the law firm of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

They are claiming violations of their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. In addition to seeking compensation, they want an injunction that orders the government to halt similar uses of force against peaceful protesters.

Scott Michelman, their lead attorney, said protests in Lafayette Square across from the White House should have “a heightened First Amendment applicability.”

He also said the Justice Department’s assertions of a security risk for the president were exaggerated as part of a cover-up of the unjustified use of force by police.

Part of the protesters’ evidence consisted of Trump’s tweets in which he called Black Lives Matter protesters “thugs.” He also called them enemies of the government.

The tweets were intended to show Trump and the police were acting with animosity toward the protesters rather than a true security concern. 

Michelman cited precedents in previous District of Columbia court decisions in asking the judge to deny the Justice Department’s request for a dismissal.

“D.C. Circuit [precedent] says very clearly the court has to probe and think carefully and skeptically about whether this was a lawful invocation of security,” Michelman said.

The judge said she would rule soon but did not set a date. The lead case in the four consolidated lawsuits is Black Lives Matter D.C. et al. v. Trump et al., case number 1:20-cv-01469, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

A+
a-
  • Black Lives Matter
  • Donald Trump
  • George Floyd
  • Jsutice Departmenrt
  • Lafayette Square
  • William Barr
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Law Enforcement

    March 28, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Elections Task Force Prosecutes 2020 ‘Vigilantes,’ Seeks More Civic Dialogue

    PHOENIX, Ariz. — A 46-year-old Ohio man has been sentenced to 30 months in prison for sending death threats to... Read More

    PHOENIX, Ariz. — A 46-year-old Ohio man has been sentenced to 30 months in prison for sending death threats to an Arizona election official. The sentencing of Joshua Russell, of Bucyrus, Ohio, came after he pleaded guilty to one count of making a threatening interstate communication.... Read More

    February 9, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    Fake Biden Robocalls During New Hampshire Primary Traced to Texas

    CONCORD, N.H. — Fraudulent robocalls using an AI-generated impersonation of President Joe Biden to discourage voting in the New Hampshire... Read More

    CONCORD, N.H. — Fraudulent robocalls using an AI-generated impersonation of President Joe Biden to discourage voting in the New Hampshire Democratic primary last month have been traced to a Texas-based company, known as Life Corp., and an individual named Walter Monk. The announcement by New Hampshire... Read More

    January 23, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Washington Lawyers’ Committee Suggests Abolishing DC Police’s Gang Database

    WASHINGTON — A report this month from the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs warns that Washington,... Read More

    WASHINGTON — A report this month from the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs warns that Washington, D.C., police appear to be violating constitutional rights to privacy with their Gang Database. Innocent persons could be placed on the list merely by associating with... Read More

    January 3, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Sen. Menendez Faces More Charges Alleging Bribe-Taking in Qatari Deal

    NEW YORK — More bribery allegations were lodged Tuesday against Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., as he faces criminal prosecution on... Read More

    NEW YORK — More bribery allegations were lodged Tuesday against Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., as he faces criminal prosecution on charges of using his political influence with the Egyptians and Qataris to help his personal finances. The superseding indictment the Justice Department unveiled Tuesday says Menendez... Read More

    December 21, 2023
    by Tom Ramstack
    Justice Dept. Accuses Real Estate Developers of Taking Advantage of Immigrants

    HOUSTON — The Justice Department on Wednesday sued real estate developers behind a large housing complex outside of Houston the... Read More

    HOUSTON — The Justice Department on Wednesday sued real estate developers behind a large housing complex outside of Houston the government has accused of taking advantage of immigrants. Colony Ridge promises the buyers secure housing but the Justice Department says it is commonly flooded with sewage,... Read More

    Cause Sought of Explosion in Arlington, Virginia, Home as Police Tried to Serve Warrant

    ARLINGTON, Va. (AP) — Hours before a massive explosion destroyed a duplex and shook a Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C., a suspect... Read More

    ARLINGTON, Va. (AP) — Hours before a massive explosion destroyed a duplex and shook a Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C., a suspect inside his home fired a flare gun 30 to 40 times into the neighborhood, drawing a large police response, officials said Tuesday. All officers escaped serious... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top