Lawmakers Contribute to Lawsuit To Block EPA’s Water Quality Rule

December 23, 2020 by Tom Ramstack
Lawmakers Contribute to Lawsuit To Block EPA’s Water Quality Rule
Wetlands outside Washington, D.C. (Photo by Dan McCue)

WASHINGTON — Members of Congress who handle environmental issues are adding their voices to a federal court case that threatens to roll back protections of the 1972 Clean Water Act.

They are siding with the plaintiffs in a lawsuit that opposes the Trump administration’s Navigable Waters Protection Rule, which they call the Dirty Water Rule.

It restricts clean water protections to a smaller area than previous interpretations of the Clean Water Act.

The Trump rule does not protect 60% of stream miles in the lower 48 states that flow less than year-round, according to members of Congress protesting the revised rule. The previous interpretation used by the Environmental Protection Agency protected more of the waterways that only flow for part of the year, also known as intermittent waterways.

The members of Congress filed an amicus brief in the case pending in Massachusetts. They say the Navigable Waters Protection Rule ignores science and undermines the ability of states to protect their own water quality.

“In 1972, Congress enacted the Clean Water Act, a landmark statute with the core objective of cleaning up the nation’s waters,” says the amicus brief signed by 74 members of Congress. “The (Navigable Waters Protection Rule) turns this statutory scheme on its head.”

Amicus briefs are legal filings in lawsuits by someone who is not a party to a case but who seeks to assist a court by offering information, expertise or insight that might be overlooked otherwise. The briefs can play important roles in the outcome of cases.

The amicus brief filed December 16 is in the case of Conservation Law Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency, which is pending in U.S. District Court in Boston. The Conservation Law Foundation is an environmental advocacy organization.

The members of Congress said in their brief that by asserting a federal rule that overrides any local control, the Trump administration is nearly ensuring the result will be dirtier drinking water for about a third of Americans.

It would lead to “the destruction of rivers, streams, lakes and wetlands throughout the nation,” says a statement from the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman, Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced the Navigable Waters Protection Rule in April as a means of clarifying its definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act.

“For the first time, the agencies have streamlined the definition so that it includes four simple categories of jurisdictional waters, provides clear exclusions for many water features that traditionally have not been regulated and defines terms in the regulatory text that have never been defined before,” the EPA said in a statement in April.

Disputes continue over the Environmental Protection Agency’s exclusion of some “groundwater” and waterways with “ephemeral features” that flow only after rainfall.

Environmentalists say the new definitions exclude streams that are important tributaries to major rivers as well as wetlands that are breeding grounds for several bird species.

“Where Congress called for science-based decision-making, the (Navigable Waters Protection Rule) largely ignores the science of clean water,” the congressional amicus brief says. “And where Congress called for a collaborative, comprehensive, and mandatory federal and state cleanup of the nation’s waters, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)—the agencies primarily responsible for implementing the Clean Water Act—have tried to decrease protections from water pollution, all based on fallacious notions about Clean Water Act federalism.”

A Supreme Court ruling this year on similar questions indicates the Conservation Law Foundation stands a good chance of winning its lawsuit.

The Supreme Court said in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund that the Clean Water Act can be used to stop polluters from dumping waste into streams, rivers, and coastal waters without a permit, even if the pollution reaches those waters through unregulated groundwater.

“The Trump Administration attempted to open a serious loophole in the Clean Water Act and was roundly rejected,” said Heather Govern, the Conservation Law Foundation’s director of clean air and water.

Other support for the Conservation Law Foundation’s position comes from President-elect Joe Biden, who announced his environmental team last week. They include Interior Department and Environmental Protection Agency leaders with strong records for environmental activism.

Biden said one of his first actions as president would be to rejoin the Paris Agreement on climate change that President Donald Trump decided to quit. He also pledged a more active water cleanup program.

A+
a-
  • Clean Water Act
  • Congress
  • EPA
  • In The News

    Health

    Voting

    Environment

    March 20, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    White House Unveils Sweeping Rules to Speed Switch to Cleaner Cars

    WASHINGTON — The Biden-Harris administration on Wednesday rolled out an ambitious new regulatory regime aimed at bolstering the standards of... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Biden-Harris administration on Wednesday rolled out an ambitious new regulatory regime aimed at bolstering the standards of electric and hybrid vehicles by placing new restrictions on tailpipe emissions. According to administration officials, who briefed reporters on the new rules during a conference call... Read More

    March 18, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    EPA Finalizes Ban on Ongoing Use of Asbestos

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Monday finalized a rule to prohibit the ongoing use of chrysotile asbestos, the... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Monday finalized a rule to prohibit the ongoing use of chrysotile asbestos, the only known form of asbestos currently used in or imported into the United States. The ban is the first to be finalized under the Toxic Substances... Read More

    March 15, 2024
    by Tom Ramstack
    Senate Told Growing Wildfire Threat Needs New Strategies

    WASHINGTON — The number of wildfires driven by climate change has grown but the U.S. effort to control them has... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The number of wildfires driven by climate change has grown but the U.S. effort to control them has not, according to emergency response officials at a Senate hearing Thursday. At least not fast enough to prevent disasters like the fire that ravaged Maui in... Read More

    March 15, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    DOE to Provide Conditional $2.26B Loan for Lithium Project in Nevada

    WASHINGTON — The Department of Energy is extending a conditional $2.26 billion loan to Lithium Americas Corp. to support its... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Department of Energy is extending a conditional $2.26 billion loan to Lithium Americas Corp. to support its effort to build a lithium carbonate processing plant in Nevada. Once operational, the plant, which will be located in Thacker Pass, about 200 miles northeast of... Read More

    March 15, 2024
    by Dan McCue
    EPA Sets Tougher Limits on Gas Used to Sterilize Medical Devices

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday finalized tougher restrictions on ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing gas commonly used to... Read More

    WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday finalized tougher restrictions on ethylene oxide, a cancer-causing gas commonly used to sterilize medical devices. The new standards specifically target commercial sterilization facilities. The agency called them “the strongest measures in U.S. history to reduce emissions of EtO,”... Read More

    US, Canada and Indigenous Groups Announce Proposal to Address Cross-Border Mining Pollution

    BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — The U.S., Canada and several indigenous groups announced a proposal on Monday to address pollution from... Read More

    BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — The U.S., Canada and several indigenous groups announced a proposal on Monday to address pollution from coal mining in British Columbia that officials say has been contaminating waterways and harming fisheries on both sides of the border for years. The proposal would... Read More

    News From The Well
    scroll top