9th Circuit Tosses Arizona Ballot Rules Finding They Discriminate

January 28, 2020 by Dan McCue

A divided federal appeals court overturned election rules in Arizona Monday on the grounds they discriminate against black, Latino and Native American voters.

In a 7-4 ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down an Arizona requirement that ballots cast in the wrong precinct must be discarded and a separate state law that made it a crime for one person to deliver the ballot of another to a voting precinct.

The decision overturned a ruling by a lower court judge who allowed the election rules to stand, and that of a divided three-judge 9th Circuit appeal, which had affirmed that ruling.

Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge William Fletcher said, “For over a century, Arizona has repeatedly targeted its American Indian, Hispanic, and African American citizens, limiting or eliminating their ability to vote and to participate in the political process.”

These practices violate the federal Voting Rights Act, the majority said.

The lawsuit challenging the state laws was filed by the Democratic National Committee. In court documents, the committee said there was clear evidence that minority voters cast ballots outside their designated precincts at twice the rate of white voters, in part because they are less likely to have transportation and more likely to work multiple jobs.

Similarly, the court majority found that prior to the introduction, in 2016, of a state law making it illegal for a third party to collect and deliver someone else’s valid ballot, a “large and disproportionate” number of minority voters relied on others to deliver their ballots.

It also noted the law was pushed through by Republicans after a “racially charged campaign.”

The minority on the en banc 9th Circuit panel filed two dissents in the case.

In one, U.S. Circuit Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain argued that the Arizona legislature was merely trying to protect elections in the state from voter fraud.

“Because no evidence of actual voter fraud is required to justify an anti-fraud prophylactic measure, the majority’s reasoning quickly collapses,” he wrote.

In the second dissent, U.S. Circuit Judge Jay Bybee suggested the majority’s ruling could inadvertently lead to Election Day chaos because it allows voters to cast their ballot wherever it is most convenient to them.

Attorneys for the state could not immediately be reached for comment. Arizona does have the right to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, in a joint statement, DNC Chair Tom Perez and DSCC executive director Scott Fairchild said the ruling was “a victory for the people of Arizona and our democracy.”

“The court’s ruling will restore out-of-precinct voting and ballot collection for the 2020 election after finding that this Republican voter suppression effort was a discriminatory attack on voters of color, including Native American, Latinx, and African-American communities,” they said.  As Democrats, our goal is to engage every eligible American voter as an active participant in our democracy by making it easier for people to vote, not harder.” 

Voting

Democrats Court Diverse Voters in Nevada
2020 Elections
Democrats Court Diverse Voters in Nevada

LAS VEGAS — Lisa Rosario describes herself as a political junkie. But she still hasn’t decided who she will support in the Democratic presidential contest. “It’s gut-wrenching because this to me is one of the most important votes that we’ve had in my generation. This is... Read More

Biden Campaign Confident As South Carolina Primary Approaches
2020 Elections
Biden Campaign Confident As South Carolina Primary Approaches
February 18, 2020
by Dan McCue

Former Vice President Joe Biden's supporters in South Carolina are not cutting and running after the candidate's disappointing finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire. In fact, canvassers going door-to-door in the neighborhoods of Charleston, South Carolina say what they're hearing more than anything else in their... Read More

In Aftermath of New Hampshire Results, a Scramble for Black Votes
2020 Elections
In Aftermath of New Hampshire Results, a Scramble for Black Votes

MANCHESTER, N.H. — What’s one thing Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar all have in common, other than the fact they each had a good showing in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary? They all come from mostly white states and have little history of electoral success... Read More

2020ers Look to Super Tuesday Even as 2 Other States Loom
2020 Elections
2020ers Look to Super Tuesday Even as 2 Other States Loom

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nevada votes next and then South Carolina. But top Democrats vying for their party's presidential nomination are already looking ahead to the biggest prize on the primary calendar: Super Tuesday, the slate of contests when more than a dozen states go to the... Read More

New Hampshire Democratic Turnout Surpasses Record 2008 Numbers
Voting
New Hampshire Democratic Turnout Surpasses Record 2008 Numbers
February 12, 2020
by Dan McCue

Turnout in Tuesday’s Democratic presidential primary in New Hampshire surpassed that of the record turnout year of 2008. With 98% reporting as of 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time, the New Hampshire vote tally stood at 295,129 - blowing by the 288,672 votes cast in the record-breaking Democratic... Read More

Even Before Iowa Fiasco, Caucuses Were on Their Way Out
Elections
Even Before Iowa Fiasco, Caucuses Were on Their Way Out

WASHINGTON — It didn’t take the high-profile disaster that was last week’s Iowa caucus for state political parties to move away from the party-run presidential preference system. Even before the Iowa debacle, caucuses were on their way out across the country. Ten states that hosted caucuses... Read More

Straight From The Well
scroll top